In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Give answer:
(A) If only conclusion I follows
(B) If only conclusion II follows
(C) If either I or II follows
(D) If neither I nor II follows and
(E) If both I and II follow.
16.
Statements: A large majority of the work force in India is unorganised. Most of them earn either the minimum or uncertain wages while others are engaged in sundry jobs.
Conclusions:
The workers in the organised sector get better facilities and stay longer in their jobs.
Some workers in the unorganised sector of the work force have a regular and fixed income.
The workers in the organised sector are not being talked about in the statement. So, I does not follow. It is mentioned that some workers in the unorganised sector are engaged in sundry jobs. This means that they have fixed income. So, II follows.
Statements: Industrial Revolution which first of all started in Europe has brought about modern age.
Conclusions:
Disparity between rich and poor results in revolution.
Revolution overhauls society.
The cause of revolution cannot be deduced from the given statement. So, I does not follow. However, the statement mentions that Industrial Revolution brought about modern age. This means that revolution overhauls society. So, II follows.
Statements: The T.V. staff deserves an applaud for showing booth capture.
Conclusions:
T.V. aims at showing things in their true perspective.
People involved in booth capturing have been recognised and are being tried by law.
Statements: America's defence secretary reiterated that they would continue to supply arms to Pakistan.
Conclusions:
Pakistan is incapable of manufacturing arms.
It would ensure peace in the region.
Pakistan's ability to manufacture arms is not being talked about in the statement. So, I does not follow. The fact in II cannot be deduced from the given statement. So, II also does not follow.
According to the statement, only those who tackle situations bravely achieve success. So, I follows. However, II is vague with regard to the given statement and so does not follow.
